All posts
    Mindset15 September 202610 min read

    Thinking About the Idea of What’s “Fair” in Property

    Most weeks as a mortgage broker in Palm Beach, I hear people talking about what is fair. It is a natural human instinct, this sense of justice and equity, and it shows up in all sorts of conversations, especially when we are talking about something as significant as housing. We tend to have this internal barometer for what feels right, what is earned, or what someone deserves, and it is pretty interesting to dig into how that applies to property.

    When you are in the market for a home, whether it is your first place or an investment, that idea of fairness often pops up. You might hear people say things like, 'It is not fair that house prices are so high,' or 'It is not fair that young people can not get a foot on the ladder,' or even, 'It is not fair that someone else got that place when we offered more.' These are all very real feelings, and they come from a deep-seated belief about how things should be.

    But what exactly do we mean by fair when we talk about property? Is it about equal opportunity, where everyone has the same chance to buy a home? Is it about equality of outcome, where everyone ends up with a home of a similar value or size? Or is it something else entirely, perhaps a sense of proportionality, where effort equals reward?

    Let us start with the idea of equal opportunity. In theory, this sounds pretty good. Everyone should have the same chance to save, to qualify for a loan, and to bid on a property. The market, in this sense, is seen as a level playing field. But even here, life experiences throw a spanner in the works. Someone born into a family that can help with a deposit has a different starting line to someone who does not. Someone with a high-paying job has a different capacity to save than someone working in a lower-paying industry.

    These differences are not necessarily about individuals being 'unfair,' but more about the systems and circumstances we find ourselves in. The opportunities are not always as equal as we might like to believe, and that is where a lot of the frustration comes from. It is hard to feel like you have an equal shot when the goalposts seem to be moving, or when others appear to have a head start that is not based on their own effort.

    Then there is the concept of equality of outcome. This is where it gets really tricky in a market-driven system like property. If we wanted everyone to have a home of a similar value, it would probably require some pretty heavy-handed intervention, like capping prices or allocating homes. That does not really align with how our property market generally operates, which is based on supply and demand, and individual choices.

    Most people would probably agree that a system where everyone ends up with exactly the same type of home would stifle innovation, choice, and personal ambition. It would also ignore the different needs and desires people have. Some folks want a big family home, others prefer a small unit, and some might not even want to own property at all. Forcing an equality of outcome feels less like fairness and more like enforced uniformity.

    So, perhaps fairness in property is more about proportionality. This is the idea that if you put in the effort, if you save diligently, work hard, and make smart financial decisions, you should be able to achieve your goal of home ownership. There is a strong sense of justice in this idea: you reap what you sow. It is about earning your place.

    This perspective acknowledges that different people have different capacities and make different choices. Someone who chooses to live frugally and save every dollar might expect to get ahead faster than someone who prefers to spend their income on travel or luxury items. And, generally, our society tends to view this as fair. It is about personal responsibility and the rewards that come with it.

    However, even this idea of proportionality gets complicated. What about those who work incredibly hard but are held back by circumstances beyond their control? What about those who get caught in an economic downturn, or face unexpected health issues, or who are simply in an industry where wages have not kept pace with the cost of living? Their effort might be immense, but the proportional reward, in terms of property ownership, might not materialise.

    This is where the conversation about fairness often intersects with broader societal issues. It is not just about individual choices, but also about the economic landscape, government policies, and global influences that all play a part in shaping the property market. Sometimes, people can do everything 'right' and still feel like they are running on a treadmill that is speeding up.

    Let us also consider the idea of fairness from the perspective of an existing homeowner. They might feel it is perfectly fair for their property to increase in value. After all, they took a risk, paid their mortgage for years, maintained the property, and contributed to the local economy. They see their home as an asset they have invested in, and its growth as a reward for that investment.

    From their point of view, it would be 'unfair' if the government suddenly devalued their asset or put limits on its potential for growth. They might argue that they played by the rules, and the market should be allowed to run its course. This is a legitimate perspective, and it highlights how different groups can have very different, yet equally valid, ideas of what fairness looks like.

    When we talk about investors, the concept of fairness can become even more charged. Some people see property investors as contributing to rising prices and making it harder for first-home buyers. Others see them as providing essential rental accommodation and taking on financial risk to do so.

    An investor might argue that they are simply participating in a legal market, taking calculated risks, and providing a service. They might feel it is unfair to be criticised for making sound financial decisions that benefit them and potentially others by increasing the housing supply, or providing a place for tenants to live. Their idea of fairness often aligns with the idea of a free market rewarding smart decisions.

    So, what does this all mean for someone navigating the property market? I think it means recognising that 'fairness' is not a simple, universal concept. It is often subjective, shaped by our own experiences, values, and current position in life. What feels fair to a first-home buyer desperately trying to save a deposit might feel very different to an established homeowner watching their equity grow.

    It is not about one idea of fairness being 'right' and another being 'wrong.' It is more about understanding these different perspectives and recognising that the property market is a complex ecosystem where various interests and values are constantly at play. This understanding can help temper some of the emotional responses that inevitably arise when dealing with something as important as housing.

    Instead of getting caught up in whether the whole system is 'fair' or not (a question that probably does not have a simple answer), it might be more helpful to focus on what you *can* control. This includes your own saving habits, your financial goals, and the choices you make about where and when you want to buy.

    It also means being realistic about the market conditions you are operating in. The market does not care about what is 'fair' in a moral sense; it operates on supply and demand, economic factors, and human behaviour. Understanding these dynamics, rather than fighting against an abstract idea of fairness, can be a more productive approach.

    For many, the path to home ownership or property investment is not a straight line. There are bumps, detours, and sometimes, moments where things feel anything but fair. But keeping your focus on your long-term goals, seeking good information, and making informed decisions are always going to be your best bet.

    And if you find yourself feeling a bit overwhelmed by all these considerations, or if you are just trying to figure out the best way forward in a market that sometimes feels a bit topsy-turvy, it is always worth having a chat with someone who spends their days navigating these waters. Sometimes, a fresh perspective and some clear information can make all the difference in making your own property journey feel a bit more manageable, no matter what your personal definition of fairness might be.

    Opinion piece by Ben Skinner. General commentary only - not financial or product advice.

    Open the door to all the possibilities

    Ready to take the first step towards your dream home? Contact us today to schedule a consultation with Ben. Let's discuss your needs and explore the best mortgage options for you.